Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<4227D42B.8040904@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
Date:	Thu, 03 Mar 2005 22:21:15 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cygwin AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
User-Agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygstart patch
References:	<49D88D820A7BC0479A7B0932D4219EFE1A4BD0 AT NAEAPAXREX04VA DOT nadsusea DOT nads DOT navy DOT mil>
In-Reply-To:	<49D88D820A7BC0479A7B0932D4219EFE1A4BD0@NAEAPAXREX04VA.nadsusea.nads.navy.mil>

Anthony --

I've applied this patch.  Thanks!

--
Chuck


Derosa, Anthony CIV NAVAIR 2035, 2, 205/214 wrote:
>>But there is an important _process_ problem.  It is the 
>>number one sin of CVS to checkin anything
>>other than ***exactly*** the code that you compiled and tested, so you
>>aren't excused from having to re-compile and re-test the code 
>>with the +1 = +2 modification applied to it, and at that point 
>>you may as well re-generate the diff.
> 
> 
> Per Dave's advice, here is the regenerated patch (re-compiled 
> and re-tested code) for cygstart.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -