delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/03/02/12:26:14

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: loading of wsock32 disturbs FPU
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:25:23 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20050302163239.GA21977@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Message-ID: <SERRANOY1SWoBDyseVw0000004f@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2005 17:25:24.0338 (UTC) FILETIME=[D189ED20:01C51F4C]

----Original Message----
>From: Christopher Faylor
>Sent: 02 March 2005 16:33

> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:37:42PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Mar  2 15:31, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Mar 2 13:33, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>> Hm.  We probably need to put a finit instruction into the autoload code
>>>> somewhere.  wsock_init () looks like just the place......  now if I
>>>> just persuade the CVS code to build without a SIG11 (grmbl grmbl....)
>>> 
>>> Hmm?  -v please.
>> 
>> I just added an finit call to wsock_init and it seems to work fine.
>> 
>> Are there any non-FPU CPUs >= i386 out there which would choke on this
>> machine instruction?  I guess not, but I'm not exactly fluent in ix86
>> history...
> 
> I mentioned to Corinna on irc that I don't think that just calling finit
> is the right way to handle this.  What if someone had already set the
> precision as they liked?  Then loading winsock would reset it.

  .... as indeed is what already happens anyway....

  But yeh, I guess saving-and-restoring fpu mode is the _really_ correct
fix.  That's a bit awkward because we don't have a convenient
pre-LoadLibrary init entrypoint in the autoload stuff, assuming I have
understood the code correctly.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019