Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/03/01/07:58:57
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 09:08:04AM +0100, David Dindorp wrote:
>Cristopher Faylor wrote:
"Christopher"
>>Anyway, this sounds a lot like the bash problem which has been
>>discussed here over the last several months (most heavily in the
>>October time frame). If you aren't running bash-2.05b-17 then
>>that's probably your problem.
>
>bash 3.0 is not good enough?
If you are running your own version of bash, then all bets are off.
I thought that bash-2.05b-17 was the current version but it is actually
a test version designed to handle the problem that you are apparently
describing. I'll follow up in cygwin-apps to see why this version is
still in test.
>I went through the archives for October (anything related to "bash"),
>but couldn't find anything that seems related to me. Would you mind
>pointing me in the right direction (subject, link, anything)?
Sorry, no. I'm not going to do an archive search for you. Maybe someone
else will accommodate you.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -