delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/02/18/05:30:07

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: cygwin bughunt (Jip-hee!)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:29:38 +0100
Message-ID: <79F81D5F4790D344B05F489CE2AC8AB71468DD@dubexdc03.dubex.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
From: "David Dindorp" <ddi AT dubex DOT dk>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id j1IAU47V025829

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Ah, yes!  You're the "you don't want people to debug cygwin because
you
> aren't spoon feeding me debugging information" guy!

That is nowhere near what was said.

I said you should provide debugging versions of Cygwin, since large
software packages are hell to build.  I was wrong in the case of Cygwin
and I admitted my mistake.

I don't know what your problem is - but I'll bet it's hard to pronounce.


> You're the guy who insisted on dropping back to 1.5.10!
> I remember now!

I'm not dropping back, it's a customer system, and it's been running
1.5.10 for some time now.


> In the future, please provide more context if you really want to be
> helped, especially after almost a month of silence.

Apologies.  A month was the time it took to get the debug version
through testing and to the affected system.  I thought the version
number and a specific location in the source code (as provided) would
be enough information to at least get a pointer from you on whether
it's a problem you've seen before.

What else do you need?


>> The test were performed with 1.5.10-3, as newer versions call upon me
>> all sorts of other problems and thus can't be pushed to the failing
>> box right now.
>>
>>> Btw, I urge everyone to try the latest cygwin snapshot!
>>
>> Will do.  Has the problem been found that results in this error?:
>> *** MapViewOfFileEx(0x188, in_h 0x188) failed, Win32 error 6
>
> 1) Regardless of whether the new versions "call upon (you) all sorts
> of other problems", I doubt that anyone is going to spend any time
> tracking down problems in older versions.

I'm not asking you to spend a lot of time on it.  I just hope you could
shed some light on the issue.  Eg. have you seen hung Cygwin processes
having to do with closing file descriptor 5 before?  Any information on
why it's closing file descriptor 5 (it's not used by the scripts) would
be helpful too.


> 2) You can *try* a snapshot to see if it fixes your problem.

"Will do" sort of implies that that was exactly
the course of action I was contemplating :-).


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019