Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/02/14/00:13:11
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:12:53PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>I can't say for sure if it's a regression, since I never got 1.5.12 to work
>>properly at all (and hence didn't back up the bin directory before dropping
>>the snapshot binaries into it). At the moment, I'm curious if the test
>>passes on non-hyperthreaded machines.
>
>
> The test passes on this hyperthreaded machine or at least it doesn't
> hang. I have been running it repeatedly. I do occasionally get a 'bad
> file descriptor' error but the test keeps on running.
Most odd. Anyway, I'm far more comfortable hacking Python than I am Cygwin, so
I'll get back to the list once I've taken some more time to dig into the guts of
the failing test.
For the pipe-handling issue, I take the fact that Python's test_subprocess
passed as a very good sign, since I understand that uses pipes for its
inter-process communication.
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan AT email DOT com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -