Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:47:15 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: several more bugs found by coreutils
Message-ID:	<20050208174715.GA22752@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References:	<020120052058 DOT 2301 DOT 41FFED5A000D5EEC000008FD22007614380A050E040D0C079D0A AT comcast DOT net> <20050202100718 DOT GA7767 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20050208174211 DOT GA3178 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20050208174211.GA3178@cygbert.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:42:11PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>I have attached a patch to newlib this time.  Thinking about that
>for a while, I'm pretty sure that it doesn't make sense to build
>old 32 bit versions of Cygwin with recent newlib versions.  So I'm
>opting for having a clean pwd.h.
>
>The below patch changes the definitions of struct passwd and utimes(2)
>according to SUSv3.

Cool.  I was wondering about that.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -