Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/02/02/12:22:06
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:28:04AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Feb 1 22:00, linda w wrote:
>> Cool - does that mean it was a bug and was fixed, or did it just
>> happen to disappear due to some other improvement? Either way...
>
>It was a bug which just didn't show up with ls from the old fileutils.
>
>> 'bout how long does it take till things go from CVS to a release,
>> these days.
>
>Usually within the same year.
>
>> I've tried twice to build from CVS, but never seem
>> to have gotten a full build to run w/no errors (not to mention having
>> a woefully inadequate machine to build such a project on...(sigh)).
>
>Did you read http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC104 lately? Otherwise,
>as Brian wrote, try a snapshot.
I thought that section was designed for punishment, not information.
Corinna, you seem to forget that we make building cygwin very hard so that
we are assured of job security.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -