Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<006e01c5078e$b2578dc0$0200000a@agamemnon>
From:	"Jon A. Lambert" <jlsysinc AT alltel DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<00b201c50767$a507e0b0$f968dc54 AT I2 DOT COM> <41FDEE90 DOT 54847D1A AT dessent DOT net> <00c301c5078b$07215240$f968dc54 AT I2 DOT COM>
Subject:	Re: Unable to properly execute a let statement from a shell script
Date:	Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:16:30 -0500
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Paolo Gesmundo wrote:
> Thanks for the responses.
>
> So, in cygwin for Win XP, is it possible to set my environment in
> such a way that the default shell
> is bash?
>

I have no clue, and I am not suggesting you do this but what would be the
affect of...

cp bash.exe sh.exe

Besides the initial installation and possible later overwrite during update,
what would be the side-affect of such a stunt?  Does cygwin take advantage
of ashism's that would break things?

--
J. Lambert


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -