Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<022f01c5048d$d32c68d0$e6ec6f83@robinson.cam.ac.uk>
From:	"Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, "Fred Kulack" <kulack AT us DOT ibm DOT com>
References:	<OF059138E8 DOT E9C31822-ON86256F96 DOT 0055F1D1-86256F96 DOT 00566531 AT us DOT ibm DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Setup.exe problem: double-click selects wrong version
Date:	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:29:03 -0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Cam-ScannerInfo:	http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
X-Cam-AntiVirus:	No virus found
X-Cam-SpamDetails:	Not scanned
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Note-from-DJ:	This may be spam

Fred Kulack wrote:
>> I think double-click should work as one single click in this case,
>> because the user gets no feedback that he've done something other than
>> he wanted to.
>
> I think that's a perfectly reasonable argument to have.
>
> If its important to the maintainers, we'll get indication of that now that
> it has been posed here.
>
> If its important to you, I suspect that patches to setup to make it
> accept a double click operation would probably be thoughtfully considered
> by the maintainers.

Why should setup be any different from other applications?

Can anyone quote any existing single-clickable UI components that 
de-duplicate double clicks?

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -