Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<1469573.1106533098757.JavaMail.root@wamui04.slb.atl.earthlink.net>
Date:	Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:18:18 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
From:	Steve Munson <stevebm AT sprynet DOT com>
Reply-To:	Steve Munson <stevebm AT sprynet DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: setup.hint coreutils editing (was: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: coreutils-5.2.1-3)
Mime-Version:	1.0

On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:45:07 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> Yes, good point.  I've swept through the setup.hints, changed all of the
> fileutils|sh-utils|textutils to 'coreutils', and removed duplicates.
> ...
> AFAICT, my list coincided with yours so everything should be up-to-date
> now.

Actually, tetex-bin still lists fileutils, sh-utils, and textutils in 
its "requires:" line, at least on mirrors.rcn.net and sigunix.cwru.edu. 
I was wondering why setup.exe still wanted to install the removed 
packages, and then I found this old thread about it.

I like the fact that the empty packages in ZZZRemovedPackages install 
nothing of their own and install coreutils instead, but I understand 
why others consider it unnerving that setup.exe seems to want to 
reinstall packages that have been removed.

Steve

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -