Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/01/20/16:35:35
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:29:36PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>
>> > On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 08:12:31PM +0100, David Dindorp wrote:
>> > >Tracking it down with GDB to cygwin_split_path() : 0x61073e06 was easy.
>> >
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:04:55 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > Since cygwin isn't built with debugging symbols, the symbols that you do
>> > see in gdb are basically meaningless.
>> >
>> > I think this has come up often enough to be a FAQ. Joshua?
>> >
>> > In any event, you do need to either build a debugging version or, possibly,
>> > use a snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ since those are currently
>> > built with debugging turned on.
>>
>> Sure, how about this:
>>
>> I've found a bug in Cygwin, how can I debug it?
>>
>> Debugging symbols are stripped from distibuted Cygwin binaries, so any
>> symbols that you see in gdb are basically meaningless. It is also a good
>> idea to use the latest code in case the bug has been fixed, so you will
>> need to either build your own debugging version by following the
>> instructions at http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC102 or use a current
>> snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>
>The entry is good, but the title implies (*GASP*) that there may be bugs
>in Cygwin. I'd suggest something like "I'm debugging within the Cygwin
>DLL space, and gdb shows garbage symbols. How do I debug Cygwin?"
It is guaranteed that there are bugs in cygwin so I don't have any problems
with using this terminology. However maybe it could be softented to something
like "I may have found a bug in Cygwin..."
An additional entry might be "Why do the symbols look funny when I try to
debug Cygwin?"
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -