Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<41ED6EED.8060605@tcicredit.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:17:49 -0500
From:	Mark Bohlman <mbohlman AT tcicredit DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: FileRunner under cygwin - simple compilation fails.
References:	<loom DOT 20050118T142731-507 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0501181010110 DOT 1614 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <loom DOT 20050118T181653-835 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0501181238270 DOT 2596 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.61.0501181238270.2596@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, CV wrote:
> 
> 
>>Thanks for your help Igor.
>>
>>Actually I found the answer by googling for
>>"___RUNTIME_PSEUDO_RELOC_LIST__". Someone had that problem fixed by
>>upgrading to the latest binutils.
> 
> 
> Ah, right, that would do it.  Strangely enough, Googling for partial
> string ("RUNTIME_PSEUDO_RELOC") didn't work -- apparently Google does
> treat underscores as letters, and not as separators...
> 
> 
>>I checked and my binutils was a 2002<something> version while there is a
>>2004... one available.
>>
>>What I can't understand is how an old 2002 version of binutils ended up
>>on my system. I installed from scratch over the internet just before
>>christmas umm.. maybe six weeks ago or so and I assumed I got the latest
>>version of everything. I must have assumed wrong !?. (unless the
>>subsequent kde installation set it back ??)
> 
> 
> Your installation is only as up-to-date as your mirror.  Plus, there may
> be *two* versions of binutils on your machine -- check your PATH.
> 
> 
>>I upgraded binutils to the 2004 version with setup and ext.c now
>>compiles. I still get the "incompatible pointer type" warnings at the
>>compilation stage but it links and creates the .dll with no complaints
>>and the application starts up.
> 
> 
> Did you check whether tcl.h gets included?  If it is, it could be a bug in
> ext.c.
> 
> 
>>It does seem to behave funny, refusing to enter certain directories, but
>>that I'll have to investigate separately.
> 
> 
> Perhaps related to the above warnings?
> 	Igor

Perhaps a file in use problem when re-installing?  It seems that I may 
have had that in the past, but never ran into significant problems that 
was so haven't investigated....
-- Mark


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -