Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:41:48 -0500 (EST)
From:	Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	CV <or254498 AT hotmail DOT com>
cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: FileRunner under cygwin - simple compilation fails.
In-Reply-To:	<loom.20050118T181653-835@post.gmane.org>
Message-ID:	<Pine.GSO.4.61.0501181238270.2596@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
References:	<loom DOT 20050118T142731-507 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0501181010110 DOT 1614 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <loom DOT 20050118T181653-835 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, CV wrote:

> Thanks for your help Igor.
>
> Actually I found the answer by googling for
> "___RUNTIME_PSEUDO_RELOC_LIST__". Someone had that problem fixed by
> upgrading to the latest binutils.

Ah, right, that would do it.  Strangely enough, Googling for partial
string ("RUNTIME_PSEUDO_RELOC") didn't work -- apparently Google does
treat underscores as letters, and not as separators...

> I checked and my binutils was a 2002<something> version while there is a
> 2004... one available.
>
> What I can't understand is how an old 2002 version of binutils ended up
> on my system. I installed from scratch over the internet just before
> christmas umm.. maybe six weeks ago or so and I assumed I got the latest
> version of everything. I must have assumed wrong !?. (unless the
> subsequent kde installation set it back ??)

Your installation is only as up-to-date as your mirror.  Plus, there may
be *two* versions of binutils on your machine -- check your PATH.

> I upgraded binutils to the 2004 version with setup and ext.c now
> compiles. I still get the "incompatible pointer type" warnings at the
> compilation stage but it links and creates the .dll with no complaints
> and the application starts up.

Did you check whether tcl.h gets included?  If it is, it could be a bug in
ext.c.

> It does seem to behave funny, refusing to enter certain directories, but
> that I'll have to investigate separately.

Perhaps related to the above warnings?
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"The Sun will pass between the Earth and the Moon tonight for a total
Lunar eclipse..." -- WCBS Radio Newsbrief, Oct 27 2004, 12:01 pm EDT

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -