Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authenticated:	#646809
Date:	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:34:38 +0100 (CET)
From:	Walter Haidinger <walter DOT haidinger AT gmx DOT at>
X-X-Sender:	walter AT banshee DOT dnsalias DOT org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	mt: DDS-3 density unknown
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.61.0501181027521.9822@banshee.dnsalias.org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Y-GMX-Trusted:	0

Hi!

mt V2.3 doesn't known about density code 0x25 which should be DDS-3.
And really, having a look at the source mt-2.3-1/mt.c shows:
...
  {0x22, "QIC-2GB-DC (DC 9250)"},
  {0x24, "DDS-2"},
  {0x26, "QIC-4GB-DC (SLR 5)"},
...

In comparison, e.g. mt_st v0.7 which comes with SuSE 9.1 knows much more.

Now, is Cygwin's mt unmaintained since even before DDS-3 tapes were 
introduced?

Just curious,
Walter

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -