Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:01:28 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: tetex 2.99
Message-ID:	<20050117170128.GG20403@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 61 DOT 0501162201020 DOT 14154 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <200501170710500 DOT SM01380 AT xuanson>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<200501170710500.SM01380@xuanson>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 02:09:04PM +0100, Dr Jekyll wrote:
>Hi, the tetex package of Cygwin is not up to date. Have anyone here succeed
>in installing the tetex 2.99? Can you share your experience? I'm done!

Good point.  You can't just indiscriminately assume that DLLs are not
executable since that would mean that the user would have no way to
control this behavior.

OTOH, I don't think we automatically have to flag DLLs on a
non-acl-aware FS as executable either.  Currently DLLs always show
up as executable.  I don't know how much work it would take to change
this and I'm not particularly inclined to look into it but this is
probably somewhere in the stat_worker function.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -