Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<200501171625.j0HGPQM13040@networking.Stanford.EDU>
X-Authentication-Warning:	networking.Stanford.EDU: hodges owned process doing -bs
Subject:	Re: odd behavior of symlinks on Win XP SP2
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-reply-to:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com> 's message of Sun, 16 Jan 2005 10:09:18 +0100
Reply-to:	Jeff DOT Hodges AT KingsMountain DOT com
From:	Jeff DOT Hodges AT KingsMountain DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0
Date:	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:25:26 -0800
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

> I'm glad that you're talking about "us" as a group.  Anybody interested
> in tracking that down?

I'm not in a position to hack code on this unfortunately, but I can offer to 
test.

I suspect it's important in the longer term to track this down because they 
(MSFT) ~could~ make further changes down the road that break cygwin-created 
symlinks altogether (from the windoze perspective), which'd more than just 
"annoying".

JeffH



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -