Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sun, 16 Jan 2005 20:13:43 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Can "DLL's" & libraries be marked as non-executable?
Message-ID:	<20050117011343.GE12175@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<41E9D722 DOT 3010306 AT tlinx DOT org> <009001c4fba2$54223c20$e6ec6f83 AT robinson DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <41EAF139 DOT 6070102 AT tlinx DOT org> <41EAFB0B DOT 8080501 AT familiehaase DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<41EAFB0B.8080501@familiehaase.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 12:38:51AM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>More to the point, what would "break" in the cygwin environment,
>
>Try to chmod 644 any dll and call a program that uses this dll.  This
>fails for me (on NT4 with NTFS), if it succeeds for you, fine.  Change
>the permissions as you like it;)

I think what's being asked is that we make a special case for dlls so
that, even if the OS says they are executable, cygwin will not call them
executable.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -