Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Memory for large arrays in cygwin/g77
Date:	Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:35:02 -0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<crurea$eg8$1@sea.gmane.org>
Message-ID:	<NUTMEG6Tnhgz2Uogux400000e95@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	10 Jan 2005 21:35:02.0046 (UTC) FILETIME=[3DE18BE0:01C4F75C]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Mark Hadfield
> Sent: 10 January 2005 21:18

> Is there a cure that would allow a simple-minded, grey-haired Fortran 
> programmer like me to rely on Cygwin g77 (or gfortran) for 
> moderate-sized computational tasks?

  LOL, I love the subtle sense of understatement you fortran guys use to
describe handling arrays of hundreds of millions of elements :)

  Anyway, the simple answer appears to be "Use g95 instead", doesn't it?

    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -