delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
At 03:53 PM 1/8/2005, you wrote: >On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Herbert Eppel wrote: > >> On 08.01.2005 08:38 UK Time, fergus wrote: >> > You can try two things. >> > 1. Install in two stages: start with the Base (default) installation and >> > pursue to completion. Then re-start setup and continue with the Full >> > installation. This should run to completion without any glitches. >> > 2. Use >> > http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.457.2.1.exe >> > instead of the standard setup executable. Again list experience suggests >> > that this will proceed to completion without the (well-known) glitches >> > induced by the standard setup. >> > Fergus >> >> Splendid - setup-2.457.2.1.exe has overcome the problem I reported yesterday >> (see http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-01/msg00333.html), and the Cygwin >> installation completed successfully :-D >> >> Many thanks. > >This looks like a good confirmation. Time to move 2.457.2.1 into the >mainstream? Yes, please! Max? -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |