Message-Id:	<200501081917.j08JHgo7020943@delorie.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Obscene content in cygwin file.
Date:	Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:15:31 -0600
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20050108135916.GA367@mikee.ath.cx>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

> On Fri, 07 Jan 2005, Gary R. Van Sickle might have said:
> 
> > > Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Good thing I didn't install it at work, and that I 
> don't work at a 
> > > > Megacorp that has whole departments devoted to rooting through 
> > > > peoples' files looking for reasons to fire them.
> > > 
> > > IMHO, this is the single best reason for obfuscating the 
> profanity 
> > > with rot13.
> > > --
> > > Francis Litterio
> > > franl <at> world . std . com
> > > 
> > 
> > Perhaps.  Could somebody tell me the single-best reason for 
> providing 
> > the profanity at all?
> > 
> > Hello?
> > 
> > Anybody?
> 
> define 'profane' first

Any of the limericks under discussion.  Your turn.

-- 
Gary R. Van Sickle
 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -