delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/01/08/08:59:31

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning: k2.mikee.ath.cx: mikee set sender to mikee AT mikee DOT ath DOT cx using -f
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 07:59:16 -0600
From: Mike <mikee AT mikee DOT ath DOT cx>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Obscene content in cygwin file.
Message-ID: <20050108135916.GA367@mikee.ath.cx>
References: <u8y75rysk DOT fsf AT world DOT std DOT com> <200501080123 DOT j081N4d2028869 AT k2 DOT mikee DOT ath DOT cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <200501080123.j081N4d2028869@k2.mikee.ath.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Organization: The Math Forum
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005, Gary R. Van Sickle might have said:

> > Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > 
> > > Good thing I didn't install it at work, and that I don't work at a 
> > > Megacorp that has whole departments devoted to rooting through 
> > > peoples' files looking for reasons to fire them.
> > 
> > IMHO, this is the single best reason for obfuscating the 
> > profanity with rot13.
> > --
> > Francis Litterio
> > franl <at> world . std . com
> > 
> 
> Perhaps.  Could somebody tell me the single-best reason for providing the
> profanity at all?
> 
> Hello?
> 
> Anybody?

define 'profane' first

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019