Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	snow.cs.uiuc.edu: braz owned process doing -bs
Date:	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:21:02 -0600 (CST)
From:	Rodrigo de Salvo Braz <braz AT uiuc DOT edu>
X-X-Sender:	braz AT snow DOT cs DOT uiuc DOT edu
To:	"Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	RE: Obscene content in cygwin file.
In-Reply-To:	<200501080220.j082KUKh008489@relay1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Message-ID:	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0501072205180.29244@snow.cs.uiuc.edu>
References:	<200501080220 DOT j082KUKh008489 AT relay1 DOT cso DOT uiuc DOT edu>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:

> > A number of people like them.
>
> A number of people like hard pore cornography too.  Cygwin doesn't provide
> that, at least not in visual form, at least not that I'm aware of.
>
> The question stands:  What is the reason Cygwin should provide this obscene
> content?

A number of people feel the dirty limericks are close enough
to the purpose of fortune for them to have been included and kept.
But nobody thought it would be interesting to include pore cornography in
Cygwin (or, for that matter, the full works of Shakespeare). If lots
of people wanted that, then it should be done too.

It all boils down to cost/benefit, benefits here being how many people
find an item good to include and costs being how many don't, and maybe
even file size as well. Pore cornography would probably involve lots of
negative reaction and large files, and the people who like it wouldn't
care since they can easily get it elsewhere. In the limericks case, the -o
option seems to have the least cost/benefit ratio.

Rodrigo

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -