delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/01/07/13:54:26

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning: denver.icd.teradyne.com: sheltonv set sender to acs AT xemacs DOT org using -f
To: ht AT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, xemacs-beta <xemacs-beta AT xemacs DOT org>
Subject: Re: Cannot build 21.4.16 under cygwin (gcc 3.3.3)
References: <f5bwtur95e1 DOT fsf AT erasmus DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <f5bk6qr94ev DOT fsf AT erasmus DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <20050105210221 DOT GA2428 AT tishler DOT net> <f5bfz1f8obh DOT fsf AT erasmus DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <20050106130856 DOT GA1068 AT tishler DOT net> <f5bacrm64gj DOT fsf AT erasmus DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <20050107121026 DOT GA3760 AT tishler DOT net> <f5b6529xekw DOT fsf AT erasmus DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk>
From: Vin Shelton <acs AT xemacs DOT org>
Organization: The XEmacs Development Team
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:53:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: <f5b6529xekw.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk> (Henry S. Thompson's message of "Fri, 07 Jan 2005 18:46:07 +0000")
Message-ID: <545r7kxnk8q.fsf@xemacs.org>
Lines: 20
MIME-Version: 1.0

ht AT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk (Henry S. Thompson) writes:

>
> But of course then I'm stuck with other code that won't run because of
> the two-different-bases problem.
>
> Anyway, thanks _very_ much for your help, it sounds like the xemacs
> folks are really where this needs to be solved.  Point is, this is a
> regression -- xemacs-21.4.15 works OK (mind you, I haven't tried
> recompiling it with gcc-3.3.3).

Henry,

AFAIK, we didn't make any changes in 21.4.16 that would account for
this.  As an experiment, can you try to build 21.4.15 with gcc-3.3.3?
I would be surprised if that worked.

  - Vin Shelton
    Release Mgr for Stable XEmacs Branch


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019