delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
ht AT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk (Henry S. Thompson) writes: > > But of course then I'm stuck with other code that won't run because of > the two-different-bases problem. > > Anyway, thanks _very_ much for your help, it sounds like the xemacs > folks are really where this needs to be solved. Point is, this is a > regression -- xemacs-21.4.15 works OK (mind you, I haven't tried > recompiling it with gcc-3.3.3). Henry, AFAIK, we didn't make any changes in 21.4.16 that would account for this. As an experiment, can you try to build 21.4.15 with gcc-3.3.3? I would be surprised if that worked. - Vin Shelton Release Mgr for Stable XEmacs Branch -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |