Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/01/07/10:05:17
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:40:35PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jan 7 01:28, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>> Right now I'm looking at the debian packages instead:
>> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/fortune-mod
>> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/fortunes-bofh-excuses
>>
>> which generate 5 packages: fortune-mod (the binaries),
>> fortunes-min, fortunes, fortunes-off, and fortunes-bofh-excuses.
>>
>> If these look ok to me, do you see any problem with using them instead?
>> (There are also a lot of non-English data files packages that I'm not
>> going to mess with at the moment.)
>
>Personally I'd rather see only one fortune package. Using the -o
>plus rot13 technique should really do it.
FWIW, if you are planning on maintaining the package I would just defer
to your judgement on whatever you think is best.
Just, whatever you do, remember the children.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -