delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-Id: | <200501070324.j073OfR0006349@delorie.com> |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: Obscene Content Tiebreaker |
Date: | Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:22:26 -0600 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <Pine.GSO.4.58.0501062154420.23902@orne> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
William R. Knox: > Has anyone who is concerned about this read some of the, > shall we say, less than pure comments that developers will on > occasion put into comments in their code? I once submitted a patch to Setup that contained a comment to the effect of: "...and people in Hell want icewater" The comment was rejected on the grounds that it might offend someone. While to this day I can't imagine how that could get anybody's panties in a bind, it was a legitimate concern and a legitimate rejection. > > If you don't like the fortunes, don't install them. Now, can > we please drop this? PLEASE? > Why? If you don't like these posts, don't read them. -- Gary R. Van Sickle -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |