Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/01/06/10:22:07
Richard Lethin wrote:
> There is a problem with the way that cygwin is updating the version
> numbers for cygwin/unison. Unison is used to synchronize filesystems;
> it can cross different operating systems over IP. The protocol uses the
> version number to decide whether two processes on different systems will
> communicate. 2.9.1 is the official released version. There is a beta
> version 2.10.2, but it is not widely deployed. Thus people (like me)
> will want to use the 2.9.1 version of cygwin's unison. However, cygwin
> is numbering its instance of this version 2.9.20-1. When you try to
> communicate using cygwin's 2.9.20-1 with a standard 2.9.1 version of
> unison running on another system, the communication fails after the
> handshake when it discovers that the cygwin version is "2.9.2 [sic]".
> Yes, I think that the handshake is truncating the protocol string.
>
> Anyway, my suggestion is that cygwin update the version of 2.9.1 that it
> is distributing, to separate the overloaded concept of version number
> into a cygwin version number (which could then be arbitrary) and leave
> the protocol number at 2.9.1
No, this is nothing to do with cygwin, and everything to do with unnecessary
inflexibility in the version checking of unison.
It would be a very bad thing for Cygwin to distribute a version of unison
which lies about which version it is to the other end of the connection.
This is a problem that needs to be addressed upstream of Cygwin.
Max.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -