delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2005/01/05/18:10:55

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning: erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk: ht set sender to ht AT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk using -f
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Cannot build 21.4.16 under cygwin (gcc 3.3.3)
References: <f5bwtur95e1 DOT fsf AT erasmus DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <f5bk6qr94ev DOT fsf AT erasmus DOT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> <20050105210221 DOT GA2428 AT tishler DOT net>
From: ht AT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk (Henry S. Thompson)
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 23:10:26 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20050105210221.GA2428@tishler.net> (Jason Tishler's message of "Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:02:21 -0500")
Message-ID: <f5bfz1f8obh.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net> writes:

> Henry,
>
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:22:48PM +0000, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>> > Suggestions?  I tried using Jason Tishler's rebase on xemacs.exe,
>> > but it refused. . .
>> 
>> Ah, but rebasing cygwin1.dll _did_ fix the problem (once I had tracked
>> down cygserver and cygrunsrv in the Process Manager and nuked them).
>
> Rebasing cygwin1.dll is not recommended which is why rebaseall
> explicitly skips it.

Oops -- sorry, your instruction page didn't mention that.

What do you recommend given the evidence so far?

[I am now also suffering from the "cygheap base address mismatch"
phenom., presumably as a result, from at least one app (psql), so I
would like a better solution.]

So, I should reinstall a clean cygwin, then rebaseall?  My naive
assumption was that was much _more_ drastic than just rebasing the
dlls involved. . .

Thanks v. much for tool and help,

ht
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht AT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019