Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:26:30 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Bug: link.exe
Message-ID:	<20050105152630.GB6991@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<41C9ED30 DOT 6000709 AT xilinx DOT com> <20041223093516 DOT GB317 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <ud5wkltz4 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <20050105100254 DOT GA5240 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20050105100254.GA5240@cygbert.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:02:54AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>The bottom line is, you can complain, but the better solution is to
>make your environment more foolproof against changes in one part of it.
>In case of MSDEV tools I suggest to put the MSDEV tool path in front of
>the Cygwin paths.  It's what I'd do anyway.

Hmm.  I have to wonder how often sound, practical advice like the above
is taken as "negative".

Given that I've seen people claim to have been "flamed" here for including
email addresses in the body of their messages, I think that some people
set the bar a little low when interpreting email in a negative context.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -