Message-Id:	<200501050315.j053FVgX007275@delorie.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Gary R. Van Sickle" <g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
To:	"'Cygwin List'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Negative
Date:	Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:15:18 -0600
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<6.2.0.14.0.20050104182216.04e5f318@pop.prospeed.net>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

> At 06:14 PM 1/4/2005, you wrote:
> >On Wednesday 05 January 2005 00:26, Isaac Foraker wrote:
> >
> >> I am, however, greatly disappointed at how negatively 
> certain members 
> >> of
> >
> >Totally agree. "Negative" is the correct word. I never felt 
> so much of 
> >it (I'm talking about just certain members, of course) on any other 
> >lists. This is just sad.
> 
> 
> Well, negative or positive, we cannot change how anyone 
> responds to posts on this list nor can we change how people 
> interpret those responses.

Pshht, well certainly not with that attitude.

;-)

-- 
Gary R. Van Sickle


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -