Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To:	Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-Id:	<6.2.0.14.0.20041222201710.04b48e08@pop.prospeed.net>
Date:	Wed, 22 Dec 2004 20:17:53 -0500
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Larry Hall <lh-no-personal-replies-please AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: How change libtool rule of naming dlls from "cygFOO-version.dll" to "FOO.dll"?
In-Reply-To:	<20041222150232.GA4002@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
References:	<0C7AD907113E984F9C2AF0B651D0D3DE57713A AT exmid04 DOT africa DOT enterprise DOT root> <6 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 0 DOT 20041222093650 DOT 04b42c18 AT pop DOT prospeed DOT net> <20041222150232 DOT GA4002 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 10:02 AM 12/22/2004, you wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 09:44:45AM -0500, Larry Hall wrote:
>>At 01:44 AM 12/22/2004, you wrote:
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Larry Hall [mailto:lh-no-personal-replies-please AT cygwin DOT com] 
>>>> 
>>>> Chaos.  
>>>> 
>>>> Windows does not support loading of DLLs through links.
>>>
>>>Thanks Larry, another validation of my distrust of windoze :-)
>>
>>
>>OK, well then I guess I should do a little work to dispel some of your
>>distrust. :-)
>>
>>After rereading this thread, I realize I'm wrong about this. :-(  When I
>>originally read the comment about linking, I thought "symbolic link", which 
>>is done so often with .so's on Linux/Unix.  That won't work because the 
>>Windows loader will not load DLLs through Cygwin's symbolic links.  However,
>>the original response did not include the '-s' flag for 'ln'.  Without it,
>>you get a "hard link" on NTFS formatted partitions and a copy everywhere 
>>else.  Windows will load either of these as a DLL (no surprise in the second
>>case at least ;-) ).
>>
>>Sorry for the confusion (mine and that which I caused).
>
>Even if it was "ln -s", it's hardly fair to blame windows for not honoring
>a cygwin invention -- symbolic links.


Aye, that it would!  



--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -