Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:05:50 -0800 (PST)
From:	"Jeremy C. Reed" <reed AT reedmedia DOT net>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
cc:	Max Bowsher <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
Subject:	Re: cp and "are the same file"
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.61.0412181946421.2298@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.43.0412221404000.21256-100000@pilchuck.reedmedia.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On Sat, 18 Dec 2004, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:

> > The suffix is required on Win9x, AFAIK, so this is not a viable route.
>
> That said, I believe the OP didn't request that gcc not produce .exe files
> by default, only how can *he* make gcc not produce the .exe suffix.  What
> you have to do is add a "." after the output (-o) filename[*].  Some
> projects define EXEEXT (or EXESUFFIX), so setting that to "." in yours
> could be all you need.

Sorry that will not work for me. I am working with over 5000 build
mechanisms. I don't want to setup wrappers and other patches to add a
period hack after the output filename.

 Jeremy C. Reed

 	  	 	 BSD News, BSD tutorials, BSD links
	  	 	 http://www.bsdnewsletter.com/


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -