Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:59:30 -0700
From:	Mark Paulus <mark DOT paulus AT mci DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Managed mount point question(s)?
In-reply-to:	<20041215183750.GC15175@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
To:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-id:	<0I8S00EIZ237E3@pmismtp02.mcilink.com>
MIME-version:	1.0
Priority:	Normal
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Thank you for that information.  That's the clue I needed.


On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:37:50 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:

>On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:19:42AM -0700, Mark Paulus wrote:
>>In general, does it make sense to mount c:/cygwin as
>>/ in managed mode?

>No.

>>Is there some reason this would not be a good idea?

>Since you are supposed to first create an empty directory, then mount it
>as managed mount, and then populate it, it doesn't make sense to do this
>with the cygwin directory unless you want to first create a normal cygwin
>directory, then create a managed directory and then move everything from
>the cygwin directory to it.

>Mounting a non-empty directory as managed is asking for trouble.

>cgf

>--
>Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
>Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/





--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -