delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Date: | Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:48:17 -0600 |
From: | Bob Smart <bsmart AT blorch DOT org> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Limitation in SCP? |
Message-Id: | <20041214184817.0a0e5b99@boing.blorch.org> |
Organization: | Blorch! |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
I haven't yet had an opportunity to try 1.5.12, and it may be a while (just because I'm responsible for keeping the databases on these machines running doesn't mean I get regular access to them...) but I'll keep that in mind next time I get a shot at them. I'd really like to blame Winduhs networking or the drivers for these particular NICs with this particular version of W2K, but then why would tar and cat work any better than scp? Shrug. I have a couple of viable workarounds, so it's primarily a matter of idle curiosity for me at this point. -- GPG public key <bsmart AT blorch DOT org> available from public key server network or from www.blorch.org/bob Fingerprint BA4A 552C BE3D 8C40 ED76 F372 DF9E 320D 37FA 16AC -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |