Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<1262.201.252.23.241.1101992954.squirrel@www.activesec.biz>
Date:	Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:09:14 -0300 (ART)
Subject:	RE: Problem with cygwin & xerces-2.6
From:	<mchojrin AT activesec DOT biz>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Hi:

  I'm new to the list, so I don't really know how to post in order to
follow a conversation. I'm reading these emails through the digest, if
anyone can help me here, that would be great too.

  Anyway, I finally solved my problem by looking at the makefiles for the
xerces examples and eventually got to the same conclusion Dave points
out in his reply. But now the question I have is this: is this ld
limitation (putting the -l option after all the .o files) only for the
cygwin implementation? Because when I run the same command on a Linux,
it doesn't matter the options order, and by the way in the man pages for
ld there's nothing about placing the -l option at the end of the line...

  Well, thanks anyway.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -