Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/11/22/13:37:34
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:11:49AM -0800, Roger Pryor wrote:
>On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:52:24 -0500
>Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
>> >
>> >This seems to have dropped into a black hole, does anyone know what is
>> >the status of tcsetattr w.r.t serial ports?
>>
>> Possibly the reason this "dropped into a black hole" is that you used
>> the word "newbie" in the subject, you didn't follow the reporting
>> guidelines at http://cygwin.com/problems.html, and while you did provide
>> a code snippet showing what you meant, you did not provide a simple,
>> compilable test case illustrating your problem. For something like
>> serial I/O, it's unlikely that anyone is going to want to hack together
>> their own test case to confirm or deny your theory that setting the baud
>> rate is broken.
>
>Thank you.
>
>Actually I was asking if there is any known problem, I was not asking
>someone to run any tests.
Ok. Then most of the above still applies.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -