Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/11/19/14:02:58
At 10:33 AM 11/19/2004, cgf wrote
>On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 09:03:10AM -0500, Larry Hall wrote:
>>At 03:55 AM 11/19/2004, you wrote:
>>>The FAQ says cygwin run on all modern 32 bit versions of Windows,
>>>except Windows CE. This includes Windows 95/98/ME/NT/2000/XP.
>>>
>>>Is there a plan to make cygwin compatible to Windows2003 (64-bit)? If
>>>yes when will it be?
>>
>>There's not much activity to make Cygwin work in a native 64 bit
>>environment at the moment. I'd say that this is waiting for someone
>>with the O/S and the interest/skills to make this happen.
>
>Actually, both Corinna and I have 64 bit platforms these days (mine was
>donated by an anonymous benefactor. I still can't get over that). We
>have a workaround for previous problems in current versions of cygwin
>so, AFAIK, Cygwin should work on 64 bit windows:
>
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2004-09/msg00002.html
Oh geez, how embarassing.... Sorry for the misinformation folks and thanks
for setting things straight Chris.
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -