delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Date: | Mon, 01 Nov 2004 15:55:29 +1300 |
From: | Danny Smith <dannysmith AT clear DOT net DOT nz> |
Subject: | Re: Need an older gcc version on my cygwin due to poor performance on gcc-3.x series. |
To: | "Gerrit P. Haase" <gp AT familiehaase DOT de>, |
Danny Smith <dannysmith AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> | |
Cc: | Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, waterthrill AT yahoo DOT no |
Reply-to: | Danny Smith <dannysmith AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> |
Message-id: | <000801c4bfbe$40351a90$3a4861cb@DANNY> |
MIME-version: | 1.0 |
References: | <000701c4bf79$fe5d1e40$316d65da AT DANNY> <4185480F DOT 3080807 AT familiehaase DOT de> |
Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Danny Smith wrote: > >> Gerrit wrote: >> >> >>> Ole Jacob Hagen wrote: >> >> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've compiled Octave-2.1.60 with gcc-3.3.3 successfully, but the >>>> performance is pretty bad with gcc-3.3.3. >>>> The performance should of Octave is much better, when compiling it >>>> with gcc-3.2.x instead. >> >> >>> It would make more sense to identify the problem and do s.th. >>> about it to resolve this issue then. >> >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563 > > Wow, this is an interesting story about exception handling. > > What I'm asking myself now: > > Should we try again to use dwarf2 exceptions? > My personal builds of gcc-3.4.x are bullt with dwarf2 EH enabled. No problems But I don't use w32 callbacks within functions that throw. I had never even thought of doing that, but I don't think much.anymore > Should we try to find the reason why SjLj exceptions are slower on > Cygwin than for the rest of the world? > Most of the rest of the GCC world has abandoned sjlj EH as inefficient Look within function prologues. Danny > > Gerrit -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |