Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<4185480F.3080807@familiehaase.de>
Date:	Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:16:15 +0100
From:	"Gerrit P. Haase" <gp AT familiehaase DOT de>
Organization:	Esse keine toten Tiere
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; de-AT; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Danny Smith <dannysmith AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
CC:	Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, waterthrill AT yahoo DOT no
Subject:	Re: Need an older gcc version on my cygwin due to poor performance on gcc-3.x series.
References:	<000701c4bf79$fe5d1e40$316d65da AT DANNY>
In-Reply-To:	<000701c4bf79$fe5d1e40$316d65da@DANNY>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Danny Smith wrote:

> Gerrit wrote:
> 
> 
>>Ole Jacob Hagen wrote:
> 
> 
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I've compiled Octave-2.1.60 with gcc-3.3.3 successfully, but the
>>>performance is pretty bad with gcc-3.3.3. 
>>>The performance should of Octave is much better, when compiling it
>>>with gcc-3.2.x instead.
> 
> 
>>It would make more sense to identify the problem and do s.th.
>>about it to resolve this issue then.
> 
> 
>  http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563

Wow, this is an interesting story about exception handling.

What I'm asking myself now:

Should we try again to use dwarf2 exceptions?

Should we try to find the reason why SjLj exceptions are slower on
Cygwin than for the rest of the world?


Gerrit
-- 
=^..^=

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -