Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:39:46 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Revised precompiled header support on cygwin
Message-ID:	<20041028143946.GB16477@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<41802878 DOT 8070208 AT agilent DOT com> <20041028013026 DOT GA5371 AT trixie DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <41807E89 DOT 3050103 AT agilent DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<41807E89.3050103@agilent.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 10:07:21PM -0700, Earl Chew wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>What do you suggest?
>>
>>If you have a patch that's ready to go, I'll review it.  If it isn't
>>ready to go then there's not anything for me to do as far as I can tell.
>>
>>If you're asking me to work on it, then that is something I don't have
>>time to do.
>
>I'm asking whether I should be submitting a patch against 3.4.1 or
>3.4.2.
>
>Cygwin seems to be at 3.4.1.
>
>The gcc folks seem to be at 3.4.2 or later.

You should always submit patches against the current gcc release
regardless of what release cygwin is on.  There's no way to modify
3.4.1 now.

Otherwise, if Gerrit wants a patch for 3.4.1 and you're willing to
provide it to him, then that's something for you both to discuss.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -