Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<417EFC7A.3010401@x-ray.at>
Date:	Wed, 27 Oct 2004 03:40:10 +0200
From:	Reini Urban <rurban AT x-ray DOT at>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; de-AT; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040817
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Mark Pizzolato <list-cygwin AT subscriptions DOT pizzolato DOT net>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: clamav-0.80-1
References:	<001101c4bbb6$f53dda50$153ca8c0 AT AlohaSunset DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<001101c4bbb6$f53dda50$153ca8c0@AlohaSunset.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Note-from-DJ:	This may be spam

Mark Pizzolato schrieb:

>> I have updated the version of clamav on cygwin.com to 0.80-1.
>> This has now a shared version of the library and several updates.
>>
>> Clam AntiVirus - GPL anti-virus toolkit
>> This distribution was built without the Windows UI.
>> You might want to use clamavwin (python wxWindows) instead.
>> See /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/clamav-0.80-1.README
> 
> 
> I'm trying to track down a potential bug in either clamav or cygwin 
> which appears while running clamd.  In order to find what and ehere I 
> tried to install the source package for this release of clamav to do 
> some debugging.
> 
> There seems to be a bug in the source package for this updated clamav 
> release..
> 
> This becomes obvious when invoking the clamav-0-80-1.sh script with the 
> argument prep or all.
> 
> The source package has a patch file named clamv-0.80-1.patch.  While 
> this patch is being applied, the patches to the first few files goes OK, 
> while the remaining patches seem to be 1) reverse patches and 2) done 
> with a diff specifying one directory level too deep.  So, I edit the 
> patch file, globally replacing /clamav-0.80/ with /.  

don't do this! these are leftovers from mkpatch

> After doing this, 
> things get furthur, but as I mentioned there seems to be a reverse patch 
> going on, so patch prompts to "Assume -R" for several files, but not all 
> of the patches can be applied anyway.  Then things go on to get worse.  
> This should probably be addressed by someone who created the patches in 
> the package.

I see. Thanks!
patching file clamav-0.80/CYGWIN-PATCHES/README
patching file clamav-0.80/CYGWIN-PATCHES/postinstall.sh
patching file clamav-0.80/CYGWIN-PATCHES/preremove.sh
patching file clamav-0.80/INSTALL
patching file clamav-0.80/Makefile.in
patching file clamav-0.80/acinclude.m4
patching file clamav-0.80/aclocal.m4
The next patch would delete the file clamav-0.80/clamav-0.80/AUTHORS,
which does not exist!  Assume -R? [n]
...

These are wrong leftovers from the mkpatch step.
Please replace in prep
     patch -b -Z -p0 < ${src_patch} ;\
with
     patch -N -Z -p0 < ${src_patch} ;\

This will safely ignore those wrong patches.

That's why it was so huge!
Sorry. I will come up with an update soon. I've found some problem by 
myself also and was already working on -2.
-- 
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -