Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<025b01c4ba0b$e6b6c200$e6ec6f83@robinson.cam.ac.uk>
From:	"Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	w32api 3.1 causes mysterious multiple definition errors
Date:	Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:56:10 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Cam-ScannerInfo:	http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
X-Cam-AntiVirus:	No virus found
X-Cam-SpamDetails:	Not scanned
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Note-from-DJ:	This may be spam

When compiling setup.exe, I get the following errors:

/usr/lib/w32api/libadvapi32.a(dspes00177.o)(.text+0x0): multiple definition 
of `_FreeSid AT 4'
autoload.o(.data+0x16b):autoload.c:83: first defined here
/usr/lib/w32api/libadvapi32.a(dspes00026.o)(.text+0x0): multiple definition 
of `_AllocateAndInitializeSid AT 44'
autoload.o(.data+0x149):autoload.c:83: first defined here
/usr/lib/w32api/libadvapi32.a(dspes00253.o)(.text+0x0): multiple definition 
of `_InitializeAcl AT 12'
autoload.o(.data+0x17c):autoload.c:83: first defined here
/usr/lib/w32api/libadvapi32.a(dspes00013.o)(.text+0x0): multiple definition 
of `_AddAccessAllowedAce AT 16'
autoload.o(.data+0x12c):autoload.c:83: first defined here
/usr/lib/w32api/libadvapi32.a(dspes00357.o)(.text+0x0): multiple definition 
of `_OpenProcessToken AT 12'
autoload.o(.data+0x193):autoload.c:83: first defined here
/usr/lib/w32api/libadvapi32.a(dspes00479.o)(.text+0x0): multiple definition 
of `_SetTokenInformation AT 16'
autoload.o(.data+0x1ad):autoload.c:83: first defined here

They disappear if I roll w32api back to 2.5 and do a clean rebuild of 
setup.exe

The extremely odd thing is that there are other advapi32 symbols used in the 
exactly the same way in the same file, which don't provoke similar errors.

Does anyone have any ideas?

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -