Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=THoRrsitVfZ0Tc7t4e/UFdrk9NrBzwTW6yERM0D4HGz+PrcPUCH9VrW/JDvdK9BpJ+l2Du+0J6zUidm1M96uqY4xtZ2GEzCTS2OzvgK7LGLAZiDEcPl0w7RUVS7QnzHlgL1Z4+R6OHuiyTuF/azBcBiMfro0XxdugEvqer1PVBo
Message-ID:	<fdb072ec041020060166ef9955@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:01:12 -0400
From:	Robert Pendell <shinji257 AT gmail DOT com>
Reply-To:	Robert Pendell <shinji257 AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: High resolution process timing
In-Reply-To:	<20041020111237.79849.qmail@web54304.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
References:	<20041020111237 DOT 79849 DOT qmail AT web54304 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Search google for "windows high resolution timer" (no quotes) and that
will probably give some answers.


On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:12:37 +0100 (BST), Lionel B
<lionelbuk AT yahoo DOT co DOT uk> wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> Is it possible in Cygwin (W2k, Pentium 4, gcc 3.3.3) to access a higher
> resolution (or perhaps I mean "granularity") process CPU timer than the libc
> clock() call? I am finding clock() inadequate for some code benchmarking.
> 
> [It is not clear to me whether this is indeed a Cygwin issue, or rather a
> Windows issue and therefore OT here - apologies if so].
> 
> Having browsed the archives, it seems that it may well be possible to access
> high-resolution *system* timers (perhaps using NT API calls to
> QueryPerformanceCounter() & family), but I can see no way to achieve
> per-process timing this way.
> 
> Any pointers appreciated,
> 
> --
> Lionel B
> 
> ___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!  http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 
> 


-- 
Robert Pendell
shinji257 AT gmail DOT com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -