Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<20041020111237.79849.qmail@web54304.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:12:37 +0100 (BST)
From:	Lionel B <lionelbuk AT yahoo DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	High resolution process timing
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Greetings,

Is it possible in Cygwin (W2k, Pentium 4, gcc 3.3.3) to access a higher
resolution (or perhaps I mean "granularity") process CPU timer than the libc
clock() call? I am finding clock() inadequate for some code benchmarking.

[It is not clear to me whether this is indeed a Cygwin issue, or rather a
Windows issue and therefore OT here - apologies if so].

Having browsed the archives, it seems that it may well be possible to access
high-resolution *system* timers (perhaps using NT API calls to
QueryPerformanceCounter() & family), but I can see no way to achieve
per-process timing this way.

Any pointers appreciated,

-- 
Lionel B



	
	
		
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!  http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -