Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<200410191343.i9JDhqUn015478@tyr.informatik.fh-fulda.de>
Date:	Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:43:52 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Siegmar Gross <Siegmar DOT Gross AT informatik DOT fh-fulda DOT de>
Reply-To:	Siegmar Gross <Siegmar DOT Gross AT informatik DOT fh-fulda DOT de>
Subject:	incompatible types in header files
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-HRZ-JLUG-MailScanner-Information:	Passed JLUG virus check
X-HRZ-JLUG-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Note-from-DJ:	This may be spam

Hi,

/usr/include/sys/features.h suggests to define "__rtems__" if you want
POSIX functionality. Unfortunately there are incompatible types so that
the compilation breaks.

eiger Solutions 39 \gcc -D__rtems__ x.c
In file included from /usr/include/cygwin/types.h:21,
                 from /usr/include/sys/types.h:365,
                 from /usr/include/stdio.h:46,
                 from x.c:1:
/usr/include/stdint.h:20: error: conflicting types for `int32_t'
/usr/include/machine/types.h:15: error: previous declaration of `int32_t'
In file included from /usr/include/sys/types.h:365,
                 from /usr/include/stdio.h:46,
                 from x.c:1:
/usr/include/cygwin/types.h:47: error: conflicting types for `dev_t'
/usr/include/sys/types.h:152: error: previous declaration of `dev_t'

eiger Solutions 40 more x.c
#include <stdio.h>

int main (void)
{
  printf ("Hello\n");
  return 0;
}
eiger Solutions 41 


Does anybody know which types are the better ones?

In /usr/include/pthread.h exist the following definitions:

#define PTHREAD_PRIO_NONE
#define PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT
#define PTHREAD_PRIO_PROTECT

They should have a value (even if the function isn't implemented yet),
e.g., Solaris 9 uses 0x0, 0x10, and 0x20.

Can somebody fix these problems? Thank you very much for any help in
advance.

Kind regards

Siegmar


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -