delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Oct 18 17:19, Brian Dessent wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > I don't think it's necessary. Since sync is a noop, it doesn't hurt > > to call it. I would go a step further. Just omit sync from the > > Cygwin release of coreutils. > > Perhaps it should be linked to /bin/true on the off chance that if some > script wants to call the sync command, it will continue to work. If a > symlink is used it would even go a bit further to underline the fact > that it's a no-op if someone lists it with ls -l - "this always returns > true, it does nothing." That sounds like a good idea to me. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |