Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<41705111.5040604@mystfans.com>
Date:	Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:37:05 +0200
From:	Soeren Nils Kuklau <chucker AT mystfans DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Macintosh/20040913)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Jani Tiainen <redetin AT luukku DOT com>
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Distributing Cygwin-based software
References:	<416ED440 DOT 4000309 AT chucker DOT rasdi DOT net> <NUTMEGwzGDCvPeSHvnN000004d2 AT NUTMEG DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <ckphmu$fb9$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<ckphmu$fb9$1@sea.gmane.org>

Jani Tiainen wrote:

> Dave Korn wrote: 
>
>> Can I have a copy of your source code please?
>
Soon :-)

> Only if daemon is published (or distributed)... =)

Give us a few weeks and we'll release it to the outside. Source and 
binaries for Mac OS X and Linux/x86.


D N wrote:

> Srvany?
>
> Try that out :)

Thanks, we will.

> sha1sum.exe? 


Calling an external tool for generating password hashes seems awkward. 
We do have openssl-devel installed, and the `sha.h' header file looks 
identical to the one we're used to (from OS X), so we're unsure why this 
bug is occurring. Since I haven't found any info on this on the 'net, 
I'll have to assume the mistake is somewhere in our code :-)

Before we've fixed that, however, we can obviously not release a Windows 
(Cygwin) binary.

As to the comments about this thread being on the wrong mailing list:

1) I don't want to be a bother - if a list moderator wants this 
discussion to stop, I'll stop, and I hereby apologize for any trouble 
I've apparently caused.

2) I personally believe that Cygwin is primarily an environment, and not 
a distribution. We do use Cygwin to build our project, because Cygwin 
feels less "alien" from our point of view. At the same time, however, we 
do not want Windows-based users to feel forced into Cygwin's behaviours. 
We want to distribute a Windows application - GPL'd, with some 
Unix-style quirks, and compatible to the other major OS'es out there, 
but Windows nevertheless. Those who truly want a full Unix experience 
wouldn't use Windows in the first place, and thus not Cygwin either.

Have a nice weekend, everyone.

-- 
Soeren 'Chucker' Kuklau

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -