delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <20041013175031.37162.qmail@web60802.mail.yahoo.com> |
Date: | Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:50:31 -0700 (PDT) |
From: | Peter Xiaochuan Huang <xchuang AT yahoo DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: gcc exception handling |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
In-Reply-To: | <20041013174611.70238.qmail@web60805.mail.yahoo.com> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Responses are below.... --- Peter Xiaochuan Huang <xchuang AT yahoo DOT com> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Peter Xiaochuan > Huang > > Sent: 12 October 2004 17:59 > > > I don't know if this a known issue. But I > encounter > > this problem when using gcc 3.3.3 on cygwin. The > code > > similar to below core dumps me. > > > > try { > > obj->dothis(); > > } > > catch ( myexception& e) > > { > > return true; > > } > > > > It core dumps on the return statement in gdb. But > when > > I make a simplified test including only above > code, > > the core dump doesn't happen any more. My program > that > > gets core dumped links pthread and uses mutex. > > Actually the return statement should invoke stack > > unwinding that will do mutex locking and > unlocking. > > Though I don't know if that is related or not. > > Are you using the correct command line options to > compile with exceptions? I tried -mthreads that didn't fix it. What is the right compile flag? > > Are you doing the final link using g++ rather than > gcc? Yes, I compiled and linked use g++ > > Do all functions have the correct throw specifiers > on their prototypes? None of my functions has any throw specifier, which means throw possibly anything. Is that good enough ? > > > Anybody else has similar problem ? > > Maybe the same problem: we never resolved it yet: > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-09/msg01380.html > > > Are there any shared libraries involved? > > >Any suggestion? > > 1) Keep trying to come up with a simple testcase? > 2) Switch gdb into assembly code view and debug the > problem by seeing what > actual values are in registers, stack and memory and > what actual machine > code instructions are getting executed to cause the > problem? I may have to try this if the compile flag you give to me doesn't fix the problem > > cheers, > DaveK > -- > Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... > > > -- > Thanks a lot for your quick response, Dave. -Peter -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |