Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<20041012174207.26685.qmail@web41504.mail.yahoo.com>
X-RocketYMMF:	kelleycook
Date:	Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Kelley Cook <kcook AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org>
Reply-To:	kcook AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org
Subject:	Re: [toplevel, Cygwin] Don't warn if both newlib and winsup are missing
To:	Zack Weinberg <zack AT codesourcery DOT com>, Kelley Cook <kcook AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org>,
	Dave Korn <dk AT artimi DOT com>
Cc:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, gcc-patches AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org
In-Reply-To:	<87y8ibu9wf.fsf@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0

--- Zack Weinberg <zack AT codesourcery DOT com> wrote:

> Kelley Cook <kcook AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org> writes:
> 
>> In July a patch was added to the Cygwin's toplevel that turns off
>> newlib if winsup isn't also present.
> 
> Hang on, is this even the right thing?  Aren't there embedded targets
> that use newlib but not winsup?

Sure there are.

But this hunk of configure code only applied to target *-*-cygwin*,
which will not build newlib without winsup.

See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg01388.html for when
this was added.

KC

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -