Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/10/08/19:16:54
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Hallo Jan,
>
> Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 um 09:16 schriebst du:
>
>
>>Charles Wilson writes:
>
>
>>>What was my objection back then? I'm sure someone objected, because
>>>otherwise it would have gone in; and I'm sure it was me, because
>>>nobody else cares about the libtool internals. :-)
>
>
>>What is relinking supposed to achieve?
>
>
> IMO, useless waste of CPU time, nothing else (well, I'm sure there are
> some bordercases where it actually needed, but if so, introduce a flag
> to force relinking during installation).
Not entirely true. With your change (or one very similar), all of the
*-exec.tests in the libtool test suite failed. These tests attempt to
run the uninstalled executable. I'm not sure why; it's probably a side
effect of the change, not just "relinking" itself. Investigating...
--
Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -