Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:09:54 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Request for a version/ revision/ release number for the whole cygwin release/ distribution
Message-ID:	<20041006150954.GF29289@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<BAY19-F9Qq5pneeFUtL00021335 AT hotmail DOT com> <4163E953 DOT 7070906 AT x-ray DOT at>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4163E953.7070906@x-ray.at>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:47:15PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
>Karl M schrieb:
>>What about calling it B21? ":>
>
>As already discussed on cygwin-talk and as officially described on the 
>webpage, "B" stood for Beta that times (up to 1998).
>
>We are already stable since a few years, though we use uneven version 
>numbers, marking it as developer releases.
>
><fun>
>So we could use "S1511" (stable 1.5.11)
>or "SS1511" (standalone stable 1.5.11)
>  - I obviously watched a lot of world war movies.
></fun>
>
>Go with the Redhat scheme and use "Cygwin 1.6.0".

Please don't do this.  Red Hat is using the even numbers.  I don't know
if there is already a 1.6.0 or not but there's certainly no reason to
irritate the organization which is providing the network bandwidth for
the cygwin release.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -